USPTO serial 76593309
AIRSTREAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AIRSTREAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
51647 Gummersbach, DE
51647 Gummersbach, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Abigail Rubinstein, Norman Thot and Paul Fields
Abigail Rubinstein, Norman Thot and Paul Fields DARBY & DARBY P.C.P.O. Box 770, Church Street StationNew York, NY 10008-0770UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | CIGARETTE PAPER, INDIVIDUAL CIGARETTE PAPERS, BOOKLETS CONTAINING CIGARETTE PAPER, CIGARETTE SLEEVES, ESPECIALLY CIGARETTE SLEEVES WITH FILTERS; UTENSILS FOR SMOKERS, NAMELY UTENSILS FOR MAKING CIGARETTES, ESPECIALLY HANDHELD DEVICES FOR MAKING CIGARETTES FROM LOOSE TOBACCO USING CIGARETTE PAPER OR CIGARETTE TUBES, TOBACCO SMOKE FILTERS, TOBACCO SMOKE ABSORBING PAPER, PAPER FILTERS; PIPES; PIPE STAMPS, TOBACCO CASES; CIGARETTE TIPS, TOBACCO POUCHES; CIGARETTE CASES; CIGAR CUTTERS; LIGHTERS, ALL ABOVE-MENTIONED GOODS NOT MADE OF OR PLATED WITH PRECIOUS METALS OR THEIR ALLOYS; TOBACCO, ESPECIALLY SMOKING TOBACCO, CIGARETTES, FILTER CIGARETTES, CIGARETTES WITH TOBACCO SUBSTITUTES, NOT FOR MEDICAL PURPOSE, CIGARILLOS, CIGARS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |