USPTO serial 76594100
KÜCHENPROFI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KÜCHENPROFI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vincent L. Ramik
VINCENT L RAMIK DILLER, RAMIK & WIGHT7345 MCWHORTER PL STE 101ANNANDALE, VA 22003-5647UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | CUTLERY NOT MADE FROM OR COATED WITH PRECIOUS METAL; FORKS; SPOONS; KNIVES; MORTARS AND PESTLES; NUT CRACKERS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; VEGETABLE AND FRUIT CORERS; VEGETABLE AND CHEESE SLICERS; VEGETABLE SCRAPERS; HAND-OPERATED FOOD CHOPPERS; SCISSORS; PLANES; PIZZA CUTTERS; ZESTERS; PALETTE KNIVES; NON-ELECTRIC CAN OPENERS; NON-ELECTRIC ICE CRUSHERS; EGG CUTTERS AND SLICERS AND NON-ELECTRIC PASTA MAKERS FOR DOMESTIC USE; MINCING KNIVES; RAVIOLI CUTTERS; HAND-OPERATED NUTMEG GRINDERS; NON-ELECTRIC VEGETABLE PEELERS; LOBSTER SHEARS; AND VEGETABLE AND POTATO CUTTERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | HOUSEHOLD UTENSILS, NAMELY, GRATERS, WHISKS, SPATULAS, COOKING SKEWERS, GARLIC PRESSES, TURNERS, SCOOPS, NON-ELECTRIC JUICERS, VEGETABLE MASHERS, VEGETABLE BRUSHES, SERVING LADLES, SERVICES TONGS, SKIMMERS, SIEVES, COLANDERS, MELON BALLERS, STRAINERS, COCKTAIL SHAKERS AND JIGGER GLASSES; PORCELAIN UTENSILS, NAMELY, SERVICES DISHES AND BOWLS, CASSEROLE DISHES, COFFEE CUPS AND MUGS; EARTHENWARE UTENSILS, NAMELY, POTS AND PANS; KITCHEN UTENSILS, NAMELY, BEEF AND PORK ROAST HOLDERS, PAPER TOWEL HOLDERS, KNIFE RACKS, CUTTING BOARDS, SALAD SPINNERS, CUTLERY ORGANIZERS FOR USE IN KITCHEN DRAWERS, CONTAINERS OF PLASTIC AND WOOD FOR HOUSEHOLD OR KITCHEN USE; RECEPTACLES, NAMELY, NON-ELECTRIC COFFEE MAKERS, FOAM CUPS, MILK JUGS, NON-ELECTRIC COFFEE POTS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, THERMAL INSULATED MUGS AND FLASKS, CANISTERS, BREAD BOXES; VINEGAR AND NON-ELECTRIC COOKING OIL SPRAYERS; COOKING OIL DISPENSERS; SALT AND PEPPER SHAKERS; ONION HOLDERS; CHEESE GRATERS; CHEESE CUTTERS; TRIVETS; SERVING TRAYS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; COCKTAIL SHAKERS; BOTTLE OPENERS; CORK SCREWS; NON-ELECTRIC CITRUS JUICERS; SALT AND PEPPER MILLS, SPICE SETS COMPRISED OF A SPICE RACK AND SPICE CONTAINERS; NON-ELECTRIC FONDUE SETS COMPRISED PRIMARILY OF A COOKING POT AND FONDUE FORKS; NON-ELECTRIC EGG BEATERS; EGG LIFTERS IN THE NATURE OF TONGS; EGG RINGS; DISH DRYING RACKS; FUNNELS FOR KITCHEN USE; POT AND PAN SCRAPERS; PASTRY SCRAPERS AND BRUSHES; TEA AND HERB TONGS AND BALLS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; ROLLING PINS; HAND-OPERATED FOOD MILLS; PASTRY CUTTERS; NON-ELECTRIC EGG BEATERS; HAND-OPERATED CHEESE GRINDERS; POTATO PRESSES; AND HERB AND PARSLEY MILLS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |