CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for E

USPTO serial 76594105

E

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James E. Shlesinger

James E. Shlesinger SHLESINGER, ARKWRIGHT & GARVEY LLP1420 KING STREET, SUITE 600ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009MAGNETICALLY ENCODED DEBIT CARDSACTIVE—
036FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, MONEY TRANSFER SERVICES, ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER SERVICES, BILL PAYMENT SERVICES, AUTOMATIC TELLER MACHINE SERVICES, DEBIT AND STORED VALUE CARD SERVICES AND DIRECT DEPOSIT SERVICES; FUNDS TRANSFER SERVICES, NAMELY THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM AND TO FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, FROM AND TO CREDIT CARD ACCOUNTS AND FROM AND TO MEMBERS; ELECTRONIC CASH TRANSACTIONS, NAMELY AUTOMATIC TELLER MACHINE CASH WITHDRAWALS AVAILABLE AT AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINES; PERSON TO PERSON AND PERSON TO BUSINESS MONEY TRANSFER SERVICES OFFERED VIA THE INTERNET AND ELECTRONIC MAIL; AUTOMATED FINANCIAL CLEARING HOUSES, DEBIT CARD SERVICES AND ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS; ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC PROCESSING AND TRANSMISSION OF BILL PAYMENT DATAACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 27, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 27, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 21, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 21, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 21, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 21, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 21, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 22, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 29, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 29, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 21, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 8, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 3, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 6, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 1, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance