Drawing for IDEAL PROCESS

USPTO serial 76594559

IDEAL PROCESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IDEAL PROCESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kyle M. Globerman

KYLE M GLOBERMAN NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGHPO BOX 11070COLUMBIA, SC 29211UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Testing, analysis and evaluation of the products and services of others for the purpose of certification; performance of audits and assessments of procedures, systems, and/or products for others to evaluate compliance with quality standards and regulations applicable to the United States and international communitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 13, 2006MAB7ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Sep 13, 2006ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Feb 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2006CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 10, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 10, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jul 19, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 26, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 6, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 21, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 14, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 7, 2005CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 7, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 7, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance