USPTO serial 76594566
PHAT BOOGIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PHAT BOOGIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin M. Kelleher
KEVIN M KELLEHER BROWN, KELLEHER & ZWICKEL LLP370 MAIN STCATSKILL, NY 12414UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Prerecorded audio tapes, audio cassettes, audio discs, compact discs, digital audio tapes, videodiscs, laser disks, CD's, DVD's, videotapes, optical discs, magnetic data carriers, all featuring music; multimedia software recorded on CD-ROM featuring music; musical sound recordings; musical video recordings; visual recordings and audiovisual recordings featuring music; downloadable films and TV programs in the nature of musical performances provided via a video-on-demand; downloadable musical sound recordings; downloadable ring tones, graphics and music via a global computer network and wireless devices; downloadable video recordings featuring music and musical performances | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF AMERICA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF AMERICA, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PHAT BOOGIE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 9, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |