USPTO serial 76594915
DRI-MOTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DRI-MOTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey S. Steen
George Likourezos Carter, DeLuca, Farrell & Schmidt, LLP445 Broad Hollow Rd.Suite 420Melville, NY 11747Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | bath linen, bath towels, bed blankets, bed linen, bed sheets, bed spreads, comforters, kitchen towels, linen, pillow cases, pillow covers, pillow shams, shams, towels, and other fabrics, namely, cotton, cotton-polyester, polyester and synthetic fiber fabrics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |