Drawing for SMARTBOND

USPTO serial 76595170

SMARTBOND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHARPER JR, SAM
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMARTBOND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael B. Martin

MICHAEL B MARTIN NALCO COMPANY1601 W DIEHL RDPATENT & LICENSING DEPTNAPERVILLE, IL 60563-1198

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Technical services for improving the strength of tissue and towels in the paper industryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jul 28, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 27, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance