USPTO serial 76595244
TRAILER PARK BOYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRAILER PARK BOYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3J 1J7, CA
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3J 1J7, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carol L.B. Matthews
CAROL L.B. MATTHEWS OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER, ETAL1940 DUKE STREETALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game programs based on a television comedy program | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 4, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 30, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ZZBX | ALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-INADVERTENTLY ISSUED ACTION | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |