Drawing for EDM-100

USPTO serial 76595777

EDM-100

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRODY, DANIEL S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EDM-100?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael E. Noe, Jr.

MICHAEL E NOE JR BRACEWELL & PATTERSON LLPPO BOX 61389HOUSTON, TX 77208-1389UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Graphite and ceramic materials for use in the manufacture of components, namely, electronic components and/or for use in manufacturing articles composed of these same materials in industry, namely, the electronic industry; graphite materials for use in manufacturing a wide variety of products in a wide variety of industries; and graphite in the form of rods, billets, electrodes, and the like for general use in the industrial arts such as electrical discharge machiningACTIVEJan 1, 1983

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 6, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 6, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 12, 2005LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
May 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 18, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance