USPTO serial 76595834
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Therese B. Varndell
THERESE B VARNDELL POSZ LAW GROUP PLC12040 S LAKES DR STE 101RESTON, VA 20191UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric or electronic sensors for sensing the presence, absence or movement of automobiles in, to or from a specified area or location; Object detectors and controllers sold as a unit for use on vehicles, namely laser, radar and ultrasonic detectors mounted on the top of vehicle doors for detecting the proximity of passengers or objects, and electrical controllers for controlling the closing and opening movements of the vehicle doors; Computerized management system for parking lots comprised of multiple parking space sensors for sensing the movement of persons or vehicles to determine if a parking space is available, and a computer and computer monitor with embedded software connected to the parking space sensors to record and display information about available parking spaces; Computerized speed monitoring system for vehicles comprised of a vehicle mounted GPS sensor for determining the rate of motion for a vehicle, a computer with embedded software connected to the speed sensor for receiving the sensed speed from the speed sensor, and three light emitting diode display bars for attaching to or embedding in the rear window of the vehicle for displaying three ranges of speeds by emitting a colored light from one of the three display bars to represent a range of speeds; computerized road condition monitoring system for vehicles comprised of four cameras for mounting on the four corners of the outside surface of the vehicle for imaging road and traffic conditions, a computer with embedded software connected to the cameras for receiving the images captured by the cameras, and four computer monitors connected to the computer for displaying the images captured by the cameras; Computerized overspeed warning system for vehicles comprised of a camera for mounting on vehicles for imaging the speed limits on speed limit road signs, a computer with embedded software connected to the camera for receiving the images captured by the camera and for recognizing the speed limit and comparing the current speed of the vehicle and the recognized speed limit, and a warning device in the nature of a visual or sound signal connected to the computer for warning the driver when the current speed is higher than the recognized speed limit | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2006 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |