USPTO serial 76596565
HRM CONNECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HRM CONNECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Russell R. Palmer, Jr.
RUSSELL R PALMER JR CHRISTIE PARKER & HALE LLPPO BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR BIDIRECTIONAL TRANSFER OF DATA BETWEEN PAYROLL SYSTEMS, MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, AND XML-COMPATIBLE SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |