USPTO serial 76596737
BAYER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BAYER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Niagara Falls, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated breath fresheners delivered via aerosol spray; Non-medicated mouthwash and gargle | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2011 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |