USPTO serial 76597010
PWR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOTT, JASON E
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PWR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bernhard Kreten
WEINTRAUB GEHSHLEA CHEDIAK SPROUL SCOTT HERVEY & BERNHARD KRETEN400 CAPITOL MALL 11TH FLSACRAMENTO, CA 95814UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | illumination devices, namely, tanning lamps and tanning beds | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |