USPTO serial 76597367
PAPER STREET TEAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3043703Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 17, 2006
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PAPER STREET TEAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Porter Ranch, CA
Porter Ranch, CA
Porter Ranch, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Colin P. Abrahams
COLIN P ABRAHAMS LAW OFFICES COLIN P ABRAHAMS5850 CANOGA AVE STE 400WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Tea; herbal tea for food purposes; tea based beverages with fruit flavoring; teabags; flavored tea; green tea | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 7, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 14, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |