USPTO serial 76597662
TIBURON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TIBURON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce H. Troxell
BRUCE H TROXELL TROXELL LAW OFFICE PLLC5205 LEESBURG PIKE STE 1404FALLS CHURCH, VA 22041-3894UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Plumbing fixtures, namely, faucets, spray spouts, shower heads, toilets, bidets, bathtubs, whirlpool tubs, sinks, water closets, shower receptors, shower arm, lavatory tops and plumbing fittings, namely, traps, cocks, bibs and valves | ACTIVE | May 15, 2004 |
| 021 | Bathroom accessories namely, towel rings, towel rails, towel bars, washbowls, soap dishes, non-metal robe hooks, toothpaste holders, tumbler/toothbrush holders, cup holders, toilet paper boxes, toilet paper holders and soap boxes, wicker baskets, soap dispenser, basins | ACTIVE | May 15, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |