USPTO serial 76597710
PREMIER BPO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3125000Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 1, 2006
- Examiner
- CHOE, KELLY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PREMIER BPO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Clarksville, TN
CLARKSVILLE, TN
CLARKSVILLE, TN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert P. Felber, Jr.
ROBERT P FELBER JR WALLER LANSDEN DORTCH & DAVIS PLLCPO BOX 198966 511 UNION ST STE 2700NASHVILLE CITY CTRNASHVILLE, TN 37219-8966Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Foreign outsourcing of technical services overseas for others in the fields of business payroll, accounting, bookkeeping, claims processing, application processing and information technology help desk and support, excluding manufacturing facilities | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 21, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |