USPTO serial 76598013
BETTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3600694Status 712
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 7, 2009
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- OFFICE OF THE TRADEMARK COMMISSIONER
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BETTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kwai Chung, New Territories, HK
Kwai Chung, New Territories, HK
Kwai Chung, New Territories, HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Benjamin L. F. Leavitt
Benjamin Leavitt Storch Amini & Munves PC2 Grand Central TowerNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | House slippers | SECTION 37 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2009 | C37. | CANCELLED SECTION 37-TOTAL | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |