USPTO serial 76598114
BUDDY CLUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BUDDY CLUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chung Ho City, Taipei Hsien, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary F. Wang
GARY F WANG LAW OFFICES OF ROGER C HSU201 S LAKE AVE STE 302PASADENA, CA 91101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Ships and watercraft and parts and accessories thereof; Aircraft and parts and accessories of aircraft; Rail rolling stock and parts and assembles; Motor vehicles and parts and accessories of motor vehicles; Two-wheeled motor cars/Bicycles and parts and accessories thereof; Strollers; Rickshaws; Sledges; Hand cars (wheelbarrows); Carts; Horse drawn carriages; Rear (pull) cars; Adhesive rubber patches for repairing tires or tubes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |