USPTO serial 76598182
RITA HAZAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3572935Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 10, 2009
- Examiner
- CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RITA HAZAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ezra Sutton
EZRA SUTTON LAW OFFICES EZRA SUTTON PAPLZ 9, 900 ROUTE 9WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair care products, namely, hair shampoos, hair conditioners, hair coloring, hair sprays, hair masks; nail care products, namely, nail polishes; and skin care products, namely, facial creams and body lotions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 19, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | ISMR | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - MANAGING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 22, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 10, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 16, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |