Drawing for ULTRACURE NCF

USPTO serial 76598838

ULTRACURE NCF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTRACURE NCF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William A. Bonk III

WILLIAM A BONK III EMERGING STRATEGIES PLLC5440 31ST ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20015-1346UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Slab-on grade concrete curing blanketsACTIVEMar 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 5, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 4, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 27, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 7, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 3, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 8, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 23, 2006RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Mar 23, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 15, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 15, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 8, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 23, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2005UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 7, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 17, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 20, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance