USPTO serial 76599054
FORBIDDEN PLEASURES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FORBIDDEN PLEASURES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
North Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norman M. Cameron; Adrian Jorgenson; Janelle Turner
Norman M. Cameron; Adrian Jorgenson; Janelle Turne Cameron IP1401 - 1166 Alberni StreetVancouver, V6E 3Z3CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Condoms | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, lingerie, sleepwear, underwear, tee shirts, aprons, sports wear, namely, T-shirts, sweatshirts, sweatpants, pants, tops, jackets, jeans, shorts, skirts, blouses, shirts and sweaters | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Confectioneries, namely, chocolates, candies, chocolate truffles, packaged hot chocolate, cookies, waffles, tea, coffee, food products, namely, spices, chocolate syrup, maple syrup and fruit syrups, honey, jams, jellies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jaymei Enterprises Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Jaymei Enterprises Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named FORBIDDEN PLEASURES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 25, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 20, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 25, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 1, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 18, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 19, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 24, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 4, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |