USPTO serial 76599102
AMERIKAN PROJECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMERIKAN PROJECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryan M. Friedman
BRYAN M FRIEDMAN FRIEDMAN PETERSON & STROFFE19800 MACARTHUR BLVD STE 1100IRVINE, CA 92612-2440UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, T-shirts, sweatshirts, tank tops, shorts, pants, swimsuits, socks, wrist bands and belts made of fabric | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 15, 2009 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 30, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |