USPTO serial 76599148
PLUS+
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLUS+?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD M. GINDY
DONALD M. GINDY DONALD M. GINDY, PLC1880 CENTURY PARK EASTSUITE 615LOS ANGELES, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | eyeware, namely, eyeglass frames | ABANDONED | Sep 9, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 26, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 2, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |