USPTO serial 76599156
DUB CITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DUB CITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
City of Industry, CA
City of Industry, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adam Fox
Adam R. Fox Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P.555 South Flower StreetSuite 3100Los Angeles, CA 90071-2300Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | TOY ACTION FIGURES AND ACCESSORIES FOR USE THEREWITH; DOLLS, DOLL CLOTHING, AND DOLL ACCESSORIES; CHILDREN AND INFANTS' MULTIPLE ACTIVITY TOYS, PLUSH TOYS, STUFFED TOYS, PLASTIC AND VINYL TOY CHARACTERS AND TOY ANIMALS, TOY FIGURES, RIDE-ON TOYS, RADIO-CONTROLLED TOY VEHICLES; FRICTION TOY VEHICLES; WIND-UP TOYS, BATTERY-OPERATED TOY VEHICLES; BATTERY-OPERATED ACTION TOYS, PUSH TOYS, PULL TOYS, MECHANICAL TOYS, TOY CONSTRUCTION SETS, TOY BUILDING BLOCKS, WATER SQUIRTING TOYS, MUSICAL TOYS, INFLATABLE TOYS, INFANT TOY RATTLES, JIGSAW PUZZLES, EQUIPMENT SOLD AS A UNIT FOR PLAYING BOARD GAMES, PARLOR GAMES, ACTION-TYPE TARGET GAMES, CARD GAMES AND ROLE PLAYING GAMES; ELECTRONIC HAND-HELD UNIT FOR PLAYING GAMES; SKATEBOARDS, TOY SCOOTERS, TOY SPORTING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, FOOTBALLS, BASEBALLS, BASEBALL BATS, GOLF CLUBS, HOCKEY STICKS AND PUCKS, SOCCER BALLS, BASKETBALLS, VOLLEYBALLS, GOLF BALLS AND GOLF ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, DIVOT REPAIR TOOLS, FOAM FLYING DISCS AND TOY BALL SHOOTERS; FOAM TOY DISCS AND BALLS FOR USE THEREWITH | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 29, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 29, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 29, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |