USPTO serial 76599438
MOLECULAR VAPOR DEPOSITION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOLECULAR VAPOR DEPOSITION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shirley L. Church
Shirley L. Church c/o Applied Microstructures, Inc.1020 Rincon CircleSan Jose, CA 95131UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | THIN FILM COATINGS; LUBRICATION AND WETTING LAYERS AND FILMS; ANTI-STICTION COATINGS; COUPLING AGENTS, BONDING AGENTS, AND ADHESION LAYERS; SURFACE MODIFYING COATINGS; MONOLAYER DEPOSITION; NANOFILM DEPOSITION; AND, RELEASE LAYERS | ACTIVE | Oct 15, 2003 |
| 007 | VAPOR DEPOSITION COATING MACHINERY SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE FOR CONTROL OF VAPOR DEPOSITION COATINGS, INCLUDING MOLECULAR VAPOR DEPOSITION COATINGS; PLASMA GENERATION EQUIPMENT; AND, VACUUM GENERATION EQUIPMENT | ACTIVE | Oct 15, 2003 |
| 009 | VAPOR DEPOSITION COATING MACHINERY, INCLUDING MEASURING, SIGNALING, AND CONTROL SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER-DRIVEN CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR VAPOR DEPOSITION COATINGS, INCLUDING MOLECULAR VAPOR DEPOSITION COATINGS; PLASMA GENERATION EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING MEASURING, SIGNALING, AND CONTROL EQUIPMENT; AND, VACUUM GENERATION EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING MEASURING, SIGNALING, AND CONTROL EQUIPMENT | ACTIVE | Oct 15, 2003 |
| 040 | MATERIALS TREATMENT EMPLOYING VAPOR DEPOSITION TECHNIQUES; VAPOR DEPOSITION COATING SERVICES; AND, REPAIR AND REFURBISHMENT OF VAPOR DEPOSITION MACHINERY SYSTEMS, PLASMA GENERATION EQUIPMENT, AND VACUUM GENERATION EQUIPMENT | ACTIVE | Oct 15, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Applied Microstructures, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named MOLECULAR VAPOR DEPOSITION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |