USPTO serial 76599475
THE SUNSCREEN THAT NEVER WEARS OFF!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4057866Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 22, 2011
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE SUNSCREEN THAT NEVER WEARS OFF!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Oakville, Ontario L6L 6M3, CA
Oakville, Ontario L6L 6M3, CA
Oakville, Ontario L6L 6M3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Grow
Michael A. Grow ARENT FOX LLP1717 K Street, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5342UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | men's, ladies' and children's clothing, namely, shirts, tops, blouses, jackets, cover-ups, skirts, pants, jumpsuits, robes and hats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Carnovale, J. Christopher
- Other trademarks owned by Carnovale, J. Christopher
- Other trademarks owned by Carnovale, J. Christopher
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named THE SUNSCREEN THAT NEVER WEARS OFF!
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 14, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |