Drawing for SYSTEMS WIZARDS

USPTO serial 76599533

SYSTEMS WIZARDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SYSTEMS WIZARDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory N. Owen

GREGORY N OWEN OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON PC455 MARKET ST STE 1910SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035PROVIDING ONLINE INTERACTIVE COMPUTER DATABASES OF INFORMATION CONCERNING EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES AND PERSONAL EMPLOYMENT INFORMATION ON THE GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 20, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 20, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 15, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 28, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 29, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 30, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 30, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 7, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance