USPTO serial 76599562
MVD MOLECULAR VAPOR DEPOSITION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3185203Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 19, 2006
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MVD MOLECULAR VAPOR DEPOSITION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHIRLEY L. CHURCH
SHIRLEY L. CHURCH c/o Applied Microstructures, Inc.1020 Rincon CircleSan Jose, CA 95131UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | COATINGS APPLIED TO SUBSTRATES; NAMELY, THIN FILM COATINGS,LUBRICATION COATINGS, WETTING LAYER COATINGS, ANTI-STICTION COATINGS, COUPLING AGENT COATINGS, BONDING AGENT COATINGS, ADHESION LAYER COATINGS, SURFACE MODIFYING COATINGS, MONOLAYER DEPOSITION COATINGS, NANOFILM DEPOSITION COATINGS, AND RELEASE LAYER COATINGS, APPLIED TO SUBSTRATES, NAMELY, SENSORS, ACTUATORS, SWITCHES, RF-MEMS, MICRO-OPTIC DEVICES, NANOIMPRINTS, AND OTHER MICROSTRUCTURES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 15, 2003 |
| 007 | POWER OPERATED VAPOR DEPOSITION COATING MACHINERY, OPTIONALLY INCLUDING SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER-DRIVEN CONTROL SYSTEMS; PLASMA GENERATION MACHINERY FOR TREATING OF SUBSTRATES, NAMELY, SENSORS, ACTUATORS, SWITCHES, RF-MEMS, MICRO-OPTIC DEVICES, NANOIMPRINTS, AND OTHER MICROSTRUCTURES; AND, VACUUM GENERATION MACHINERY FOR USE IN COMBINATION WITH VAPOR DEPOSITION COATING MACHINERY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 15, 2003 |
| 040 | MATERIALS TREATMENT EMPLOYING VAPOR DEPOSITION TECHNIQUES FOR THE APPLICATION OF VAPOR DEPOSITION COATINGS TO SENSORS, ACTUATORS, SWITCHES, RF-MEMS, MICRO-OPTIC DEVICES, NANOIMPRINTS, AND OTHER MICROSTRUCTURES; AND VAPOR DEPOSITION COATING SERVICES FOR THE APPLICATION OF VAPOR DEPOSITION COATINGS TO SENSORS, ACTUATORS, SWITCHES, RF-MEMS, MICRO-OPTIC DEVICES, NANOIMPRINTS, AND OTHER MICROSTRUCTURES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 15, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Applied Microstructures, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Applied Microstructures, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Applied Microstructures, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named MVD MOLECULAR VAPOR DEPOSITION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 2, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |