CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for NON-STICK SURFACE BERNDES BETTER_BAKING ANTIHAFTVERSIEGELUNG

USPTO serial 76599618

NON-STICK SURFACE BERNDES BETTER_BAKING ANTIHAFTVERSIEGELUNG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3128371Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 15, 2006
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with NON-STICK SURFACE BERNDES BETTER_BAKING ANTIHAFTVERSIEGELUNG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stewart L. Gitler

Stewart L. Gitler WELSH FLAXMAN & GITLER LLC2000 Duke StreetSuite 100Alexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021small household and kitchen utensils and household and kitchen containers not of precious metal or coated therewith, namely baking dishes, dishes, pots, cooking pots except for pots for deep frying, stock pots, sauteuse pans, pans, coffee bottles, sandwich boxes, butter dishes, trays, butter pans, bowls, serving dishes, plates, cups, mugs, drinking cups, children's mugs, whistling kettles, kettles, containers for keeping food and drinks warm and cold, hand operated fruit juice extractors, inserts and lids for all the aforesaid goodsSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 22, 2013C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Feb 3, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 23, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 3, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 29, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 29, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 9, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 9, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 9, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 3, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 19, 2005DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Aug 5, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 5, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 28, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance