USPTO serial 76599644
PARADISE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PARADISE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Helen Sears
MARY HELEN SEARS SEARS LAW FIRM CHTD910 17TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-2601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Imported and domestic olive oil and vegetable oils | ACTIVE | May 18, 1950 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2010 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 27, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 27, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 23, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |