USPTO serial 76599894
INTUITEXT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTUITEXT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bucharest 71504, RO
Bucharest 71504, RO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey M. Samuels
KATHRYN JENNISON SHULTZ JENNISON & SHULTZ PC2001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYSUITE 1102ARLINGTON, VA 22202-3618Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR LEARNING MANAGEMENT, CONTENT MANAGEMENT, CONTENT AUTHORING, INDIVIDUAL LEARNING; EDUCATIONAL SOFTWARE FEATURING INSTRUCTION FOR MATHEMATICS, PHYSICS, ART, RELIGION, SCIENCE, ECONOMICS, PSYCHOLOGY, HISTORY, PHILOSOPHY, GEOGRAPHY, CHEMISTRY, COMPUTING, TRADES AND INDUSTRY, MARKETING, MANAGEMENT AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT, INVESTMENTS AND FINANCE, BUSINESS LAW, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, ACCOUNTING; TEACHING MATERIALS, NAMELY, TUTORIALS, ENCYCLOPEDIAS, DICTIONARIES RECORDED ON COMPACT DISKS, OPTICAL DISKS AND MAGNETIC DISKS; LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS COMPRISING SOFTWARE FOR LEARNING MANAGEMENT, CONTENT MANAGEMENT, CONTENT AUTHORING; INTEGRATED TEACHING SYSTEM COMPRISING COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR LEARNING MANAGEMENT, CONTENT MANAGEMENT, CONTENT AUTHORING, INDIVIDUAL LEARNING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE PLATFORMS FOR DISTANCE LEARNING TECHNOLOGY FOR LEARNING MANAGEMENT, FOR CONTENT MANAGEMENT, FOR CONTENT AUTHORING, FOR INDIVIDUAL LEARNING; SOFTWARE SYSTEMS FOR INSTRUCTION COMPRISING LEARNING MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE, CONTENT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE, CONTENT AUTHORING SOFTWARE | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | ONLINE DATA CONVERSION OF COMPUTER PROGRAM DATA USING INTELLIGENT FORMATS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 4, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |