Drawing for LEGACY FOR MINISTRY

USPTO serial 76600045

LEGACY FOR MINISTRY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TIERNEY, MARGERY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEGACY FOR MINISTRY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID S. WELSH

DAVID S WELSH TREVOY SIMPSON LLP680 MANULIFE PL10180-101 ST EDMONTONALBERTA, CANADA T5J 3S4,

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded CD's, videotapes, audiotapes, laser disks, and DVD's featuring Christian religious subjectsACTIVE—
016Printed matter, namely pamphlets, booklets, and books featuring Christian religious subjects, and printed instructional, educational and teaching materials in the area of Christian religious educationACTIVE—
036Charitable fund raising services, financial planning servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 21, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 12, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 12, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 30, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 15, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 18, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 18, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 18, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 20, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 19, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 11, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 30, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 2, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 2, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 29, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance