Drawing for SUPER-CYCLONE

USPTO serial 76600403

SUPER-CYCLONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPER-CYCLONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael I. Kroll

MICHAEL I KROLL171 STILLWELL LNSYOSSET, NY 11791UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011environmental control apparatus, namely, solar venting fanACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 8, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 8, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 15, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 13, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 13, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 25, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 11, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 10, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 29, 2006PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Jun 6, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 6, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 5, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 5, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 5, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 30, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 29, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 29, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance