USPTO serial 76600458
ELECO EASYBUILD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELECO EASYBUILD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ware, Hertfordshire, SG12 0EF, GB
Ware, Hertfordshire, SG12 0EF, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey R. Gray
JEFFREY R GRAY BARNES & THORNBURG LLPPO BOX 2786CHICAGO, IL 60690-2786UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR DESIGNING AND CONTROLLING THE MANUFACTURE OF STRUCTURAL BUILDING COMPONENTS; SIMULATION SOFTWARE FOR ARCHITECTURE; MULTIMEDIA SOFTWARE RELATING TO ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OF BUILDINGS AND BUILDING COMPONENTS RECORDED ON CD-ROM; PROGRAM DOCUMENTATION, OPERATING AND USER MANUALS, SOLD WITH THE FOREGOING | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | DESIGN FOR OTHERS OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE RELATING TO ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OF BUILDINGS AND BUILDING COMPONENTS, UPDATING FOR OTHERS OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE RELATING TO ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OF BUILDINGS AND BUILDING COMPONENTS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS RELATING TO ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OF BUILDINGS AND BUILDING COMPONENTS; INSTALLATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE RELATING TO ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OF BUILDINGS AND BUILDING COMPONENTS; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AND CONSULTANCY RELATING TO THE DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL BUILDING COMPONENTS, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OF BUILDINGS AND BUILDING COMPONENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |