Drawing for PRO KOTE SUPREME

USPTO serial 76600804

PRO KOTE SUPREME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRO KOTE SUPREME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank P. Presta

FRANK P PRESTA NIXON & VANDERHYE PC1100 N GLEBE RD 8TH FLARLINGTON, VA 22201-4714UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR PAINTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Nov 5, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 31, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 26, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 26, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 26, 2007UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Jan 25, 2007FAXXFAX SENT—
Jan 12, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 12, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 20, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 20, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 20, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 20, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 13, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 13, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 16, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance