USPTO serial 76600805
PRO KOTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRO KOTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank P. Presta
FRANK P PRESTA NIXON & VANDERHYE PC1100 N GLEBE RD 8TH FLARLINGTON, VA 22201-4714UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR PAINTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 13, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |