USPTO serial 76600945
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William A. Munck
WILLIAM A MUNCK DAVIS MUNCK PCPO BOX 800889DOCKET CLERKDALLAS, TX 75380-0889| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS PRODUCTS, NAMELY, TELEPHONE SYSTEMS COMPRISING A HANDSET AND CONSOLE UNIT; WIRED AND CORDLESS TELEPHONES; SPEAKERPHONES, ALSO KNOWN AS HANDS FREE TELEPHONES; MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT COMPRISING A CONTROL TELEPHONE UNIT, TRANSCEIVER AND ANTENNA; WIRELESS TELEPHONES AND COMPONENT PARTS THEREOF; BATTERIES FOR WIRELESS TELEPHONES; TELEPHONE ANSWERING MACHINES; CALLER IDENTIFICATION DEVICES; MODEMS; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS SWITCHES AND VOICE MAIL AND MESSAGING; TELEPHONE INSTALLATION APPARATUS, NAMELY, PHONE MOUNTS, DUAL OUTLET ADAPTERS, TELEPHONE OUTLETS, MODULAR JACKS, WIRE JUNCTIONS AND PLUG-IN CONVERTERS; INTERACTIVE TELEVISION UNITS FOR ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION FROM DATA BASES; TELECOMMUNICATIONS SWITCHES; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR MANAGING TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS; VOICE AND DATA TRANSMITTING, TRANSCEIVING AND RECEIVING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, TELECOMMUNICATION TRANSCEIVERS, CENTRAL OFFICE AND REMOTE TERMINALS, CHANNEL BANKS, ELECTRONIC PLUG-INS AND PAIR-GAIN APPARATUS, BASE TRANSCEIVER STATIONS; NETWORK MULTIPLEXERS; DATA COMMUNICATION MULTIPLEXERS AND CONCENTRATORS; VIDEO TERMINALS; ELECTRIC EMERGENCY CALL UNITS; VIDEOPHONES; PAGERS; PERSONAL COMMUNICATORS, NAMELY, WRITING STYLI AND TABLETS THAT ENABLE INDIVIDUALS TO COMMUNICATE OVER A WIRED OR WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK; AND VIDEO TELECONFERENCING PRODUCTS, NAMELY, VIDEO TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS, VIDEO DISPLAY MONITORS, VIDEO CAMERAS, LOUD SPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, KEYPADS, CODERS, DECODERS, MULTIPOINT CONTROLLERS, COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR OPERATING THE VIDEO CONFERENCING EQUIPMENT, AND VOICE ACTIVATED OR CONTROLLED TELEPHONES AND TELEPHONE SYSTEMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 11, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |