Drawing for XL X-LOOK

USPTO serial 76601018

XL X-LOOK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3124076Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 1, 2006
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XL X-LOOK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS T. CHAN

HELEN B JIANG LAW OFFICE OF HELEN B JIANG923 E VALLEY BLVDSUITE 112ASAN GABRIEL, CA 91776

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Eyewear, namely optical frames, sunglasses, sports glasses, glasses casesSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDMar 1, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2014C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Sep 24, 2014CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 12, 2014CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Jun 21, 2012PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 24, 2011NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2011C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 24, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 3, 2011E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 25, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 1, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 14, 2006REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 2, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 30, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Apr 29, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 9, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 9, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Mar 20, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 24, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 28, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 22, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 16, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 30, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 16, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance