USPTO serial 76601029
THE SAPPHIRE BLUE HORN SECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE SAPPHIRE BLUE HORN SECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas I. Rozsa
THOMAS I ROZSA ROZSA & CHEN LLP15910 VENTURA BLVD STE 1601ENCINO, CA 91436-2815UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRERECORDED CD'S AND TAPES FEATURING MUSIC AND PRERECORED DVD'S AND VIDEOTAPES FEATURING PRERECORED MUSIC AND PREROCORDED CONCERTS PERFORMED BY A MUSICAL GROUP | ACTIVE | Jul 31, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |