USPTO serial 76601255
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Chad J Wiegand
CHAD J WIEGAND PRICE, HENEVELD, COOPER, DEWITTPO BOX 2567GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501-2567UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | FIRE TRUCKS AND FIRE ENGINES | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 20, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |