Drawing for AMERICAN FIRE APPARATUS

USPTO serial 76601255

AMERICAN FIRE APPARATUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMERICAN FIRE APPARATUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Chad J Wiegand

CHAD J WIEGAND PRICE, HENEVELD, COOPER, DEWITTPO BOX 2567GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501-2567UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009FIRE TRUCKS AND FIRE ENGINESACTIVEOct 1, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 11, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 11, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 20, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 29, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 25, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 4, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 22, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 22, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 21, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 20, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 8, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 7, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 16, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 21, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance