USPTO serial 76601362
TYOTU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TYOTU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Washington, DC
Washington, DC
Silver Springs, MD
Silver Springs, MD
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Sporting apparel, namely, pants, shirts, t-shirts, shorts, wristbands, headbands, sneakers, hats, caps, socks, jackets, sweat pants and sweatshirts | ABANDONED | Jun 6, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Porter, Marwan E.
- Other trademarks owned by Porter, Marwan E.
- Other trademarks owned by Steele, Gary A.
- Other trademarks owned by Steele, Gary A.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named TYOTU
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |