USPTO serial 76601493
NO CLOTHING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 16, 2007
- Examiner
- WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NO CLOTHING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Great Neck, NY
Great Neck, NY
Great Neck, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura B. Siegal
LAURA B SIEGAL39 CHESTNUT RDMANHASSET, NY 11030-1208UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | WOMEN'S AND MEN'S APPAREL, NAMELY, UNDERWEAR, BOXER SHORTS, BRAS, CAMISOLES, TANK TOPS, T-SHIRTS, SHIRTS, TOPS, BLOUSES, POLO SHIRTS, TURTLENECKS, SWEATERS, SHORTS, PANTS, JEANS, SWEATSHIRTS, SWEATPANTS, OVERALLS, DRESSES, SKIRTS, PAJAMAS, NIGHTGOWNS, NIGHTSHIRTS, BATHROBES, SOCKS, HOSIERY, LEGWARMERS, SCARVES, TIES, BELTS, COATS, JACKETS, HATS, CAPS, SLIPPERS, SHOES, SNEAKERS, GLOVES, MITTENS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 10, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 6, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |