USPTO serial 76601690
SUPREME FOOD MARKET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3204710Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 30, 2007
- Examiner
- SHIH, SALLY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUPREME FOOD MARKET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ezra Sutton
EZRA SUTTON LAW OFFICES OF EZRA SUTTON PA900 US ROUTE 9, STE 201PLZ 9WOODBRIDGE NEW, NJ 07095Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | DETERGENT SOAP, DISH DETERGENTS, AND LAUNDRY DETERGENT; FABRIC SOFTENERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 7, 2006 |
| 016 | TOILET PAPER, PAPER TOWELS, PAPER NAPKINS, AND DISPOSABLE DIAPERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 7, 2006 |
| 029 | CANNED FOODS, NAMELY, CANNED FRUITS, CANNED COOKED TOMATOES, CANNED CUT VEGETABLES; DAIRY-BASED BEVERAGES, DAIRY-BASED DIPS; FROZEN FRUITS, FROZEN VEGETABLES, FROZEN MEALS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT, FISH, POULTRY OR VEGETABLES; PREPARED MEALS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT AND FISH; HAMBURGERS; HOT DOGS; POTATO CHIPS, FROZEN ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT; CANDIED FRUIT SNACKS; FRUIT-BASED SNACK FOOD; SAUSAGES; TUNA FISH; CORN OIL, VEGETABLE OIL, SOUPS, PEANUT BUTTER; PROCESSED NUTS AND SHELLED NUTS; MILK, DRIED FRUITS, PICKLES; MEATBALLS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 7, 2006 |
| 030 | CAKES, ICE CREAM, PIZZA, COOKIES, PROCESSED POPCORN, SPAGHETTI, SPAGHETTI SAUCE, KETCHUP, VINEGAR, SALAD DRESSINGS, MAYONNAISE, MUSTARD, PASTA, CEREAL PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, BREAKFAST CEREALS, SALT, PANCAKE SYRUP, AND PANCAKE MIX; SPICES; TEA AND TEA-BASED BEVERAGES WITH FRUIT FLAVORING; COFFEE, AND CAKE MIXES; BARBECUE SAUCE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 7, 2006 |
| 031 | FRESH FRUITS AND FRESH VEGETABLES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 7, 2006 |
| 032 | SOFT DRINKS; FRUIT JUICES; COLAS; CONCENTRATES, SYRUPS OR POWDERS USED IN THE PREPARATION OF SOFT DRINKS OR FRUIT DRINKS; FRUIT FLAVORED SOFT DRINKS; DRINKING WATER, AND SPRING WATER | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 7, 2006 |
| 035 | RETAIL GROCERY STORE SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 18, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BROAD FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BROAD FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named SUPREME FOOD MARKET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 21, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |