USPTO serial 76601770
G.A.V.E.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with G.A.V.E.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing for men, women and children, namely, turtlenecks, pea coats, baseball jackets, trench coats, bomber jackets, tank suits, snow suits, pullover fleeces, skull caps, jerseys, hooded sweatshirts, flight suits, zip up fleeces, bucket hats, bike shorts, overalls, bikini suits, warmup suits, jogging suits, sweat suits, sweat pants and sweat shirts; jump suits, body suits, wet suits, ski suits, ski jackets; swimwear bathing suits, beach and bathing coverups; long T-shirts, short T-shirts, crewneck T-shirts, thermal shirts and pants thermal; shorts, sweat shorts, gym shorts; tops jackets, sport jackets, sport coats, suits, slacks; trousers; pants, jeans, jean jackets; shirts, sports shirts, knit shirts, golf shirts; pullovers; sweaters, vests, tank top, fleeces; blazers, play suits, overcoats; parkas; wind resistant jackets, leather jackets; footwear, shoes; boots, slippers; casual footwear; sandals, headwear; beanie, hats; caps; hoods, berets; headbands, sweatbands; visors, wrist bands; ear muffs; neckwear; neckties; neckerchiefs; scarves, bandannas; sleepwear; robes, pajamas, night shirts; rainwear; gloves, mittens, rain coats; loungewear, underwear, briefs, underpants, boxer shorts; undershirts, T-shirts; socks and aprons | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2008 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2005 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |