USPTO serial 76601994
DEFENSE SUPPORT SERVICES LLC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3102353Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 6, 2006
- Examiner
- CASTRO, GIANCARLO
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DEFENSE SUPPORT SERVICES LLC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James J. Kozuch
James J. Kozuch Caesar, Rivise, Bernstein, Cohen & Pokotilow, Ltd.1635 Market Street11th Floor, Seven Penn CenterPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2212Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF PHYSICAL PLANTS, NAMELY, BUILDINGS, ROADS, GROUNDS AND POWER PLANTS, FOR MILITARY BASES AND GOVERNMENT FACILITIES; REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF MILITARY AND GOVERNMENT-OWNED AIRCRAFT, GROUND EQUIPMENT, AND WEAPONS SYSTEMS; AND HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES, NAMELY, CLEANING OF GOVERNMENT AND MILITARY BUILDINGS AND LAUNDRY SERVICES FOR GOVERNMENT AND MILITARY FACILITIES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 23, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 6, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jun 14, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 6, 2013 | WDRL | OTQR WITHDRAWAL FROM PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 23, 2013 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |