USPTO serial 76602004
REAL FOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 26, 2006
- Examiner
- COGGINS, ROBERT H
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with REAL FOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SALINAS, CA
SALINAS, CA
Seattle, WA
Seattle, WA
Seattle, WA
SEATTLE, WA
SEATTLE, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott A. Edelman,
Scott A. Edelman, GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP2029 Century Park East, Suite 4000Los Angeles, CA 90067-3026UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [ Applesauce; baked beans; bean dip; cheese spreads; cole slaw; cranberry sauce; ] cut fresh fruits; [ fresh or cooked cut vegetables; dairy-based dips; dips, excluding salsa and other sauces used as dips; fresh or frozen entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables;] food package combinations consisting primarily of cheese, meat and/or processed fruit; garden salads; [ guacamole; hummus;] fresh or frozen meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; [ pickled vegetables;] salads, except macaroni, rice and pasta salad [ ; sandwich spread, namely, tuna fish and egg salad; snack dips, excluding salsa and other sauces used as dips; soups; tapenades; and vegetable salads ] | ACTIVE | Apr 23, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by REAL FOODS OF SEATTLE, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by TAYLOR FARMS NORTHWEST, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by NorStar Specialty Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NorStar Specialty Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NorStar Specialty Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by HEIRLOOM FOODS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by TRIPLE B CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named REAL FOODS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 31, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 31, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 26, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 6, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 6, 2013 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 24, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |