USPTO serial 76602085
ZEER-OH'S!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBBINS, ODESSA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZEER-OH'S!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OAKVILLE, ONTARIO L7L 4X7, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
INGRID E. SCHMIDT
INGRID E SCHMIDT GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLPPO BOX 1045, LCD 1HAMILTON, ON L8N 3R4CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | BAKED GOODS, NAMELY-- COOKIES AND WAFERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |