USPTO serial 76602125
TELEFIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TELEFIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Chester, PA
West Chester, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nancy A. Zoubek
Nancy A. Zoubek Jones Day222 East 41st StreetNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | surgical and medical implants, instruments and apparatus, for use with the anterior stabilization of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine, namely, intramedullary nails, bone screws and bone plates, angulated plates, compression plates, nuts for screws, bone clamps, washers for screws, pedicle screws, hooks for spondylolysis splints, cerclage wires, implants for the vertebra; medical and surgical instruments and tools specially adapted for use with the anterior stabilization of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine, namely, saws and rasps for bones, oscillating saws, saw blades, surgical drills, drill guides, thread cutters, surgical distractors, bone forceps, reposition forceps, forceps, surgical elevators, surgical reamers, bone cutter, surgical impactors, screw drivers, screw wrenches, and gauges for measuring the length of surgical screws, bone hooks, plate tensioners, tweezers for screws, surgical gauges for drilling, surgical trocars, scissors all for use with the anterior stabilization of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine; bone clamps and staples, internal and external fixators, pelvic clamps; aiming devices for use with the anterior stabilization of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine; centering sleeves, protective sleeves, sterilizing trays and cases for the aforesaid medical/surgical instruments and implants; artificial bones for implanation, parts of artificial bones for augmenting natural bones; implants, instruments and apparatus for use with the anterior stabilization of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 25, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 21, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 21, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |