Drawing for TAUPO CLEARWOOD

USPTO serial 76602306

TAUPO CLEARWOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHISOLM, KEVON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TAUPO CLEARWOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rosemary S. Tarlton

ROSEMARY S. TARLTON MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET STREETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Non-metallic building materials, namely, building, manufactured, sawn, worked, semi-worked, rough sawn, gauged, and dried timberACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 24, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 25, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 20, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 20, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 20, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 19, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 12, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 14, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 20, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 20, 2006CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 19, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 19, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 22, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 26, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 25, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 4, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2005UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance