USPTO serial 76602469
LAKME BEAUTY SALON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LAKME BEAUTY SALON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Backbay Reclamation Mumbai - 400 020, IN
Backbay Reclamation Mumbai - 400 020, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert Alpert
ROBERT ALPERT BRYAN CAVE LLP1290 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Medical services; skin care salons; beauty salons, namely hygienic and beauty care for human beings, beauty solutions, and skin care advice, all excluding hair cutting, styling and hair care services; medical clinics, health care massage; health spa services, namely, cosmetic body care services featuring baths for hygiene/health purpose, ayurvedic also known as holistic health treatment, physical therapy, and advice on positive health, physical therapy, stress relief, aches, pains, weight loss, health consultation, facials, and skin care | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |